Cursor vs Sourcegraph Cody
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and quality scores.
92Quality
Cursor
AI-first code editor built on VS Code that integrates powerful AI coding capabilities directly into the editing experience.
View DetailsVS
80Quality
Sourcegraph Cody
AI coding assistant with full codebase context that understands your entire repository for accurate answers.
View Details| Feature | Cursor | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Quality Score | 92 | 80 |
| Pricing | $0 free (limited) / $20/mo Pro / $40/mo Business | Free for individuals / $9/user/mo Pro |
| Monthly Visits | 15M | 3M |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4.4 |
| Launched | 2023 | 2023 |
| Free Plan | Yes | Yes |
| API Available | No | Yes |
| Platforms | macos, windows, linux | vscode, jetbrains, web |
| Key Features | ai-code-completion, codebase-chat, multi-file-editing, natural-language-editing, docs-reference, vscode-compatible | code-completion, codebase-context, chat, code-explanation, refactoring |
Which is better: Cursor or Sourcegraph Cody?
Cursor has a higher quality score (92 vs 80), indicating better overall quality and user satisfaction. Cursor is freemium ($0 free (limited) / $20/mo Pro / $40/mo Business) while Sourcegraph Cody is freemium (Free for individuals / $9/user/mo Pro).